The EU and US compared to Japan’s situation

Posted on 31st January 2012 by Trevor in Blog

The Cato Institute presents the situation with an interesting data point, “The average EU country would need to have more than four times (434 percent) its current annual gross domestic product (GDP) in the bank today, earning interest at the government’s borrowing rate, in order to fund current policies indefinitely.”

The situation is not quite as profound in the US, though we will be seeing a dramatic increase in the age dependency ratio (the number of people of retired age relative to those of working age) between 2010 and 2030 as the Baby Boomers retire: in 2010 there were 22 people aged 65 and older for every 100 people of working age. By 2030, this number will have grown to 37 people aged 65 and older for every 100 people of working age.

However, while the ratios are not as poor in the US as in Europe, the unfunded liabilities the US faces are truly astronomical. USAToday puts the number at $61.6 trillion in unfunded obligations, an amount equal to roughly $528,000 per US household.

Japan makes both the EU and the US look tame.  In 2009, Japan already had 35 people aged 65 or older for every 100 people of working age. However, by 2050, this number will have swelled to an incredible 73 people aged 65 or older out of every 100 people of working age. This among other things sets Japan as a ticking time bomb.

The EU, Japan, and the US comprise $36 trillion of the global $64 trillion economy (roughly 57%). So this debt overhang will have a profound impact on global growth particularly in the developed world going forward.

This debt overhang will result in several developments from a political perspective. For one thing, the social contract between Governments and retirees will have to be re-negotiated, as the money promised by the former to the latter simply isn’t there.

Governments will try to deal with this in one of two ways: by raising taxes on high- income earners/ any other potential avenue for raising revenues and by reneging on the promises made to retirees.

The impact these moves will have on the political landscape will be profound. Among other things we will be seeing more protests both at the ballot box and in the streets (Greece’s riots are a taste of what’s to come for much of Europe and eventually the US).

To picture how a cutback in social programs will impact the US populace, consider that in 2011, 48% of Americans lived in a household in which at least one member received some kind of Government benefit. Over 45 million Americans currently receive food stamps. And 43% of Americans aged 65-74 are Medicare beneficiaries.

Consider the impact that even a 10% reduction in these various programs would have on the US populace.

Make no mistake, we are heading into a Crisis that will make 2008 look like a joke. The money for all of these various programs (both in Europe and the US) simply isn’t there. 

So a word to the wise; start saving and NOT in your home country or country of residence, give us a call we can help 03 5724 5100

The Fed speaks

Posted on 30th January 2012 by Trevor in Uncategorized

Low rates continue to 2014. Last year, the Federal Reserve predicted that the US economy would recover into 2012, and expectations were that the central bank would begin tightening interest rates by as early as 2013. This week we learned that the Fed expects to hold rates “exceptionally low” until late 2014. Although the Fed expects inflation to remain low, gold had a big rally believing instead that inflation will increase. Do you remember the rule of 72? When people still put money in the banks – to estimate how long it takes for your money to double, simply divide 72 by the interest rate. So at 6% – 12 years and 5-6% was on the low side for a long time. It was helpful to know in those days that one did not have to learn about risky investments and could still grow their savings. Here is the Fed fund rates since 1952.

These are the rates that the Fed (a private corporation) charges banks and unfortunately they do not pass along these great rates to us and at the same time banks no longer pay us any worthwhile interest to hold our funds. If your bank gives you 2% interest on your savings you can double your money in 36 years and at 1% in 72 years. Though by then that money will not be worth much as long as the Fed exists and prints the value of money away. graphs – RTTNews

 

Are oil producers are running at full capacity?

Posted on 24th January 2012 by Trevor in Blog |Uncategorized

 

Source: IEA/Goldman Sachs

Gold …

Posted on 19th January 2012 by Trevor in Blog

Dear Friends, 
 
2011 was a year of confusion among financial leadership, many conversations, much speculation, spectacular MOPE and no action. Europe almost talked the euro to death while the media carefully avoided the epic debt of Great Britain and the insolvency of US States.
 
2012 is going to be year of action and consequences. Today action by the IMF simply throws more money at the problem, which is treating symptoms. The question now is where are these funds coming from? The US Fed has already provided more than $600 billion via swaps with the ECB, who in turn lend this money to the Euro banks, who in turn buy Euro debt. It is international debt monetization, a thinly bearded global QE3. You can be certain that the creation of funds for the IMF’s eventual one trillion in financial aid will be created as thinly bearded global QE3.
 
Before 2012 is out, political pressures in the US will bring the Fed out of the closet and full-blown QE3 will actively be pursued in daylight.
 
Rather than a collapsing euro there will be a collapsing dollar. The economic effect of QE3 will bring on extremely complex factors of monetary science. A contraction in general business activity will be contrary to what will be anticipated.
 
2012 will be the year of actions and consequences with a range in the price of gold, in my opinion, between $1700 and $2100. This is the absolute opposite of what was generally anticipated just one week ago.
 
Gold shares were actively depreciated by scheming hedge funds run by young bucks that have no knowledge of the extractive industry. They all will make spectacular recoveries.
 
Take the most recent transaction in the gold market between Eldorado and Euro Gold as a benchmark. It took place at $271 per pounce average price from inferred to proven. Many of these companies are selling at a discount to wholesale value and all the campaigning by the hedge fund shorts cannot hold the price at such a discount to wholesale value. The unsolicited calls of the concerned stockholder hedge fund trader should be viewed against the size of their put positions before using their hedge long to hammer the market in order to profit from their short via put positions taken listed and as OTC derivatives. These destroyers have no idea of what building entails.
 
I spent a 12-hour day traveling to New York City meeting with six different major investment funds and firms specializing in precious metals shares. In the last four months I have met with over 100 professional money managers in precious metals and have no intention of letting up slack in my activities. We discussed the economics of gold and gold shares. I can guarantee you that the change, when it comes for bullied and forced lower price gold shares, now in many cases below wholesale value of the entities, gold resources will move violently to the upside.
 
The cash and willingness to act is there. All that is needed is a catalyst and the upside move will be as or more vicious than the calculated manipulation was by young destroyers to the downside.
 
2012 will be the year of consequences for actions, more so than just in the price of gold and the unexpected dollar weakness of the 2nd half. It will be payback time.
 
Respectfully,
Jim

Jim Sinclair is the Chairman and CEO of Tanzanian Royalty Exploration Corporation (TRE: Altanext NYSE platform, TNX: Senior Toronto Stock Exchange). He is a precious metals and commodities specialist. Some of the highlights of his nearly 50 year career include the founding of Sinclair Group of Companies (1977), which offered full brokerage services. Mr. Sinclair served as a Precious Metals Advisor to Hunt Oil and the Hunt family for the liquidation of their silver position as a prerequisite for the $1 billion loan arranged by the Chairman of the Federal Reserve, Paul Volcker. He was also a General Partner and Member of the Executive Committee of two New York Stock Exchange firms and President of Sinclair Global Clearing Corporation and Global Arbitrage .

He has authored numerous magazine articles and three books dealing with a variety of investment subjects. He is a regular speaker at various commodities related events.

In January 2003, Mr. Sinclair launched, “Jim Sinclairs MineSet,” which now hosts his gold commentary and is intended as a free service to the gold community.

 

GOLD, yes we are still talking about it.

Posted on 19th January 2012 by Trevor in Blog |Finance in Focus

The start of 2011 was a phenomenal start for junior mining PM stocks but the
latter half of the year was very negative. Still, one could have done very well
in 2011 with junior mining stocks by taking profits off the table when they
existed and letting one’s remaining capital ride risk-free in the junior mining
sector. In addition to using discipline to protect profits when they exist in
the junior mining sector, the greatest friend of a gold/silver investor is
patience. Sometimes one knows that great moves higher are coming, but one’s
timing may be off by a mere six to nine months. Patience will allow one to still
reap the bulk of the rewards from these great moves higher as long as one isn’t
shaken out of the markets by the banking cartel induced price volatility in
gold/silver assets. To this end, I leave you with 10-year charts of gold and
silver. Sometimes, it really is necessary to step back and take a deep breath to
see the forest from the trees.

 

 

 

 

 

Cement

Posted on 18th January 2012 by Trevor in Uncategorized

A question for readers: How big is China when it comes to cement? Keep in mind
that the EU and the USA have GDPs of about $15T apiece. China is much smaller
and has a GDP closer to $6T. Knowing that, what’s your guess on how China
stacks up in the world of cement? I would have thought that China was as big as
the US or EU. The economy is smaller, but they are building so much, my guess
was about equal.

Wrong.
wrong. wrong. I must admit, I was blown away by this:

 

China is 25 Xs larger than either the US or EU! When it comes
to cement, forget the rest of the world and focus on what is happening in the
country with a 54% market share.

China’s
cement production has been on a tear for years. But it’s slowing down. The
production for 2011 will come in at 1.88mm metric tones, an increase of only 6%
over 2010 (the slowest in 15 years). The Cement Association of China is
forecasting that 2012 total production will be “about the same as 2011”. We
shall see. I saw this article on cement pricing in Sichuan province.

 

 

Since 2004 China’ GDP has doubled. So has its cement production. That’s not a
coincidence. The forecast for unchanged production in 2012 is inconsistent with
high growth in GDP. What does zero growth in cement production translate into
Chinese economic growth? My guess is that 4% GDP would be a good result. That
would be well below stall speed for China.